800 words

When examining eligibility rules, a social worker looks for an  alignment between the rules and the conceptualization of the social  problem the policy or program is meant to address. Additionally, when  analyzing policies and programs, they look for potential problems that  eligibility criteria might introduce, such as “stigma, alienation,  off-targeting of benefits, overwhelming costs, over-utilization and  under-utilization, political interference, and negative incentives and  disincentives” (Chambers & Bonk, 2013, p. 106). These issues  represent potential problems that undermine policy and program  functionality (Chambers & Bonk, 2013, p.106). Notice that the  presence of any one of the problems mentioned by Chambers and Bonk can  work against the adequacy, equity, and efficiency of a policy or  program.

By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following competencies and behaviors:

• Competency 3: Advance Human Rights and Social, Economic, and Environmental Justice.
  • C3.GP.A: Apply their understanding of  social, economic, and environmental justice to advocate for human rights  at the individual and system levels.
    • Related Assignment Criteria:
      • Discuss how the potential policy change would advocate for human rights and social and economic justice.
      • Explain how and why potential policy changes would advance social well-being.

In this assignment, you will analyze the eligibility criteria of an  entitlement program, evaluate the impact of these criteria, and consider  how potential changes might serve social well-being.

Assignment Instructions

For this assignment, complete the following:

• Explain an entitlement program and analyze its eligibility criteria.
• Using the list from Chambers and Bonk, explain the potential  problems the specific eligibility criteria might introduce and confirm  if any of these problems applies to the program that you have  identified. These potential problems include:
  • Stigma.
  • Alienation.
  • Off-targeting of benefits.
  • Overwhelming costs.
  • Overutilization and underutilization.
  • Political interference.
  • Negative incentives and disincentives.
• Analyze any alterations in the eligibility criteria that could potentially reduce or eliminate the identified problems.
• Explain how and why potential policy changes would advance social well-being.
• Discuss how the potential policy change would advocate for human rights and social and economic justice.

Reference

Chambers, D. E., & Bonk, J. F. (2013). Social policy and social programs: A method for the practical public policy analyst (6th ed.). Pearson.

The assignment you submit is expected to meet the following requirements:

• Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
• APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting standards.

^{"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."}